The late Rabbi Harry Wohlberg
taught Midrash at Yeshiva University to generations of Semikha students. He
asked his students on one occasion to explain why the Talmud states that the
Mizbeah (altar of the Temple) itself cries for a couple going through a divorce
proceeding. Why was this metaphor of a "crying altar" used? Rabbi
Wohlberg explained that the altar was the scene of bloody activity on a daily
basis, it had become de-sensitized to blood and gore; yet it could not tolerate
the scene of a couple seeking to end their marital relationship.
Divorce takes its toll on
many individuals, in a ripple effect. It is no wonder that divorce is
frequently listed among the five biggest traumas in the adult experience.
Unfortunately, its negative impact affects multiple generations, with children
often the greatest victims of all.
It is estimated that more
than half of the marriages in the U.S. will end in divorce. I have not seen
comparable statistics for Jewish marriages but we know that the rate of divorce
is growing significantly. In my post-rabbinic career, I have chosen to work in
the field of divorce as a Divorce Mediator. I find this work to be both
satisfying and greatly needed. I can think of no situation, with the possible
exception of custody disputes, where mediation is not far more beneficial and
therapeutic that that which can be found in the traditional adversarial system
of battling attorneys.
Mediation, unlike litigation,
fully involves the couple in an open discussion and negotiation concerning the
conditions of the divorce settlement. This discussion is facilitated by a
mediator who serves as a neutral party, assisting the couple in reaching an
agreement. Mediation is an optimistic profession in that believes that adults,
even when they possess variant interest and needs, can reach an accord that will
be fair and balanced. Mediation utilizes skills that the couple will need to
use even after the divorce if they share children. Mediation allows the couple
to close the door on their marriage, but not slam it. It is an example of what
constructive communication can yield.
There is a Hassidic insight
that defines Pessah as the combination of two words: Peh Sah. "The mouth
speaks". We show our most basic humanity when we become free enough to
state opinions, wants and needs. Through the medium of speech we can define
problems and we can then begin to seek solutions. The ability of a couple, even
in the midst of divorce, to seek solutions rather than blame, lies at the heart
of mediation. More importantly, mediation trains the couple in the power of
working collaboratively toward a shard goal. The need for such positive and
focused conversation can serve us on the communal level as well.
A question that occurs to me
often is: why does our society expect a couple to marry as Benei Torah and yet
allow them (frequently) to divorce as battle-hardened mercenaries? Judaic
values are often observed only in their breach when many couples negotiate
their divorce settlement. This situation is aggravated exponentially when the
rancor becomes so great that the Get (religious divorce) becomes a bargaining
chip. It is, at times, to our chagrin, withheld (or not accepted) by a
recalcitrant spouse. I would like to propose in an outline form some
suggestions that deal with Jewish divorce and the painful status of the Agunah. Many of these thoughts derive from the
model of mediation where finger-pointing is rejected in favor of constructive searches
for solutions and frank discussion. However, one caveat is in order. In order
to discuss Jewish divorce, we first need to discuss Jewish marriage. In like
manner, in order to discuss Agunah concerns, we must communally first address
Jewish marriage as it currently exists.
Social critics have often commented on how society tests for driving competence
before it issues a motor vehicle license, but does not do so before it issues a
marriage license. How do we prepare our future generation for married life in a
society which accepts "disposable" relationships as a cardinal
principle of romantic faith? I believe we need to apply our education paradigms
toward martial preparation and counseling. Many communities have begun
projects, often called "Hupah Project" "Shalom Project"
etc. In some communities, such programs involve an interface between Jewish
Family Services and the rabbinic community. The purpose of these programs is to
offer sessions with the newly-engaged couples in order to teach communication
skills, introduce halakhic norms, and offer guidance on issues that will need
to be negotiated in marital life. For many couples, this will represent their
first opportunity to meet community professionals in the religious sphere as
well as the mental health arena. The group setting offers the couple a chance
to listen and also a chance to dialogue. They are introduced to potential
challenges and also strategies for a successful resolution of the same. The
couple learns to listen, to talk, and to problem-solve; these are qualities
that serve us all well in our daily exchanges.
I have seen in recent years a
dramatic growth of mental health professionals who are well-versed in both
Jewish law and social theory and practice. It is no longer unusual to see a young
man/woman go through many years of Yeshiva education and then choose to serve
her/his community by electing to become a mental health practitioner. The
rabbinate and the mental health professionals need to work hand-in-hand and
cross-refer when appropriate in this area. It would be a worthy project to have
a national roster of such professionals whose expertise in the areas of marital
life and Shalom Bayit make them a natural resource for married couples. I know
of no organization that is limited to those who specialize in issues affecting
married life but I think the need for such a group is self-evident.
The role of Rashei Yeshiva
has been discussed and debated in multiple journal entries. I will only offer
the observation that the influence of these leaders among our religious young
adults is great. I do believe that their role in stressing the need to learn
proper communication skills would be most valuable. These rabbinic leaders
should encourage students to seek professional intervention when this is called
for. Their lectures should stress the need for positive communication and the
need to seek solutions in a spirit of collaboration. Finally, these leaders,
and others, when confronting the reality of the dissolution of a marriage,
should encourage the positive method of mediation rather than the divisive
alternative of lengthy confrontation and litigation. (As an aside, mediated
divorces have been projected as representing 20% of the cost of a litigated
divorce. The money saving is, however, far from being the real benefit of such
an approach.). We need, in short, to teach the skills for a positive home life,
reinforce them, give hizzuk where needed and set a tone for an integration of
Jewish values coupled with insights from contemporary social thought. We also
need to remember the advice that "Values are not taught, they are
caught".
Preparation for married life
needs to be a prime focus of our educational and communal curricula. We must
ask how are we to train our students for the life skills they will need for
successful married life. Yemei Iyun on such topics as communication skills,
pre-nuptial agreements, Jewish sexuality need to be more widespread. More
importantly, we need to ask what objectives we seek, and how to we plan to get
there. It might be appropriate to recall the thought that "If you don't
know where you are going, all roads will take you there". I daresay that
we know where we are going. My question is directed at the query as to whether
we know how to get there.
There is a story about a
young child who saw some starfish awash on the seashore. She took them one at a
time and hurled them back into the sea. She was asked: "There are so many
starfish here, do you think you can possibly help them all?" She answered:
"I don't know, but I just made a difference in the life of the one I sent
back to the ocean". I do not have a solution which will remedy the
"Agunah problem". I do believe however, that like the girl in the
story, we need to focus attention on the micro as much as the macro, i.e. why
do we have an Agunah problem, and can we make a difference?"
A few years ago, attorney
Joseph Rackman, wrote an article about a registry that would contain the names
of recalcitrant spouses. Their respective communities would put the appropriate
pressure on such individuals to bring about the desired effect of effecting the
granting of Gittin. I met with attorney Rackman to discuss his proposal and
made a suggestion. Should we not first meet with each spouse who was acting in
such a defiant fashion and explore what was sparking the unacceptable behavior?
It is easy to accuse all recalcitrant spouses of being "money-hungry"
and manipulative. However, this may not have been the original trigger. There
may have been a call for "someone to listen" that was never heeded.
There may have been a negative experience with a Beth Din. There may have been
pre-existing threats from the opposing spouse. Idle legal threats may have
caused a violent reaction. We will never know unless we try to reach out and communicate.
Our system is not fool-proof and neither are our appointed representatives. In
our zeal to help one spouse (as sacred as that work is) we dare not demonize
the other without first trying to hear from them. Communal pressure ultimately
is quite important. But let us not forget the need to first enter into
conversation with those who flaunt our halakhic and ethical norms.
One of the organizations
working with this issue, ORA, has offered couples pro bono mediation when there
is a hope that communication can be productive. Even if we fail in our attempts
to reach out to these individuals, we will gain a wealth of insight into how
our community structure has "broken down" and why we have failed to
impress some community members with the thought that "Her ways are ways of
peace".
We have much to gain by
offering mediation assistance to couples who are unable to find the proper
manner to dissolve their marriage and its attendant issues. I do not believe we
have made the institution of marriage a communal priority in terms of education
, outreach and financial support. To cite one example, the Catholic groups have
family institutions, seminars, lecture bureaus, etc. Prominent Church leaders
head such efforts and have even become national figures. What have we done in
our community to try to emulate such work? (On a personal note, I have
communicated with 5 major Jewish organizations, in order to volunteer to try to
initiate some of the proposals outlined herein. Only 1 of the 5 actually
responded.) Marital life is probably the most vital Jewish institution to
ensure continuity of our value system. What have we invested in such an
undertaking? Where are our communal structures?
If we felt the pressing need, we could convene a meeting on Agunah and divorce.
Papers could be presented, issues debated, and dialogue begun. With every year
that we fail to do something of this nature, we miss an opportunity that is
desperately needed. Indeed our national conferences always have the occasional
session on issues of Jewish marriage. But don't we need and deserve more? We
have organizations for Agunah. Do we have similar organizations that deal with
Jewish marriage, Jewish divorce, and the halakhic norms that surround them?
To the above, I would add the
need for blogs so that community members with specific needs have a place to go
for direction and inspiration. I maintain such a website for those who seek a
Get but do not know where to turn. A great Kiruv opportunity exists if we make
the effort to explain to the non-Orthodox what a Get entails, help them find a
proper Beth Din, and organize volunteers to help them through their Get
process. We shout about the tragedy of Agunah and yet we allow the non-Orthodox
to be unaware of the Get process, thus dooming future generations to our
community's ultimate rejection; i.e. mamzerut. Surely there is more work that
can engage us in this area.
To succed as Torah Jews, the Brisker Rav stated, we need to be business-like. We need to have a mission statement, objectives, and resources, in addition to moral commitment. This is the regimen we would undertake for our business and this must be our charge as Torah leaders. There is work to be done in the area of Ishut, and all that the term entails. We all have ideas and strategies. Perhaps the time for "Peh Sah" has arrived. We need to dialogue, talk, and listen. We need to work collaboratively. If we apply such an approach, the challenges presented in the areas of Jewish Marriage, Jewish Divorce, and Agunah, we will be worthy of Bilaam's coerced admission: "How goodly are your tents Jacob". I can think of no greater praise, or goal, than that."
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman, LMHC
Sometimes I get so angry I canât see straight.
Perhaps youâre being blinded by the reflection of the son.
Thatâs not a typo. Many parents have said to me that their childâs behavior reflects upon them. They report being embarrassed, not for their child, but by their child, when he behaves inappropriately in a public place. They donât feel bad that their child is making a fool of herself. They feel bad that sheâs making a fool of them. Thatâs when the parent says something inappropriate in that same public place, and the situation spirals downward rapidly. Blinded by the reflection of their childâs behavior on them, they donât know what to do.
There is a way to break the downward spiral, maybe even prevent it. It requires some analysis of this concept that a childâs behavior reflects upon his parents. Where did that idea come from?
The same place all important ideas come from. Torah.
When Yaakov Aveinu left his parentsâ home, he asked Hashem for two things: lechem lâechol uâbeged lilbosh, literally âbread to eat and clothing to wear.â Bearing in mind that he left home with a specific instruction from his father to find a wife, it seems more reasonable to for him to have dovened for success on meeting a suitable wife and raising a family with her. According to Tosefes Bracha (Braishis 28:20), Yaakov was dovening for a wife and children, using the term lechem to allude to a wife, and the term beged to allude to children. Tosefes Bracha cites Rashi on Braishis 39:6 to show that Yosef alluded to aishes Potifar with the term lechem, demonstrating that the word lechem is used elsewhere to refer to a wife. But where else do we see children referred to as clothing?
In the following gemara:
âNow Yehoshua was clothed with filthy garments.â (Zachariah 3:3) Surely it was not his wont to wear filthy garments! But this intimates that his sons married women unfit for the priesthood and he did not stop them. (Sanhedrin 93a)
The High Priest Yehoshua is described as garbed in clothing that is soiled by his childrenâs inappropriate behaviors.
Tosefes Bracha explains:
Children are like a personâs clothing. Just as a garment enhances the appearance of a personâs body, children enhance his soul, as it says in Mishlei (10:1) âA wise son brings joy to his fatherâ because the father is honored through him. Thus it also taught in the Midrash Tanhuma on Vayikra, âin the merit of children, fathers are honored.â This was the reason for referring to a person as the father of an illustrious son, as in Terach avi Avraham, Kish avi Shaul, Avuah dâShmuel, and others in Tanach and Shas. On the other hand, children who do not behave appropriately stain and diminish their fatherâs name and honor; they are like a sign of disgrace on his clothing.
So we see from Torah how the behavior of a child does reflect upon his parents. How do you make your child reflect positively upon you? How did Yehoshua, the Kohel Gadol with dirty clothing, make his children clean up their act so he wouldnât be sullied by their behavior?
According to the Malbim, he didnât. The malach told his subordinates to remove the soiled clothing from Yehoshua. The Malbim explains that this meant to remove the suffering he felt from the sins of his sons.
This doesnât mean Yehoshua was told to ignore the sins of his sons. It means he was taught that he neednât be soiled and diminished by the sins of his sons. He was shown that he was still worthy of wearing the mitznefes, the crown of High Priesthood, even though he had been unable to prevent his sons from making terrible mistakes. From that position of honor he would more likely influence his sons to mend their ways; more likely, but there are no guaranties.
That is made clear by the gemara Sanhedrin 104a. The Mishna listed Kings of Israel who had lost their place in Olam Haba. The gemara wondered why some very wicked Kings were not included in that list.
And why was [the wicked King] Amon not included? Because of [his son, the righteous King] Josiah's honor. Then Manasseh [the righteous King Hezekiah's son] too should not be included, because of Hezekiah's honor?
[The answer is that] a son confers merit on his father, but a father confers no merit on a son, as the pasuk says, âNeither is there any one that can deliver out of my hand.â (Devorim 32:39) Avraham cannot deliver Yishmael, and Yitzchak cannot deliver Esau.
Yishmael and Esau did not bring honor to their fathers. But their failures didnât prevent their fathers from becoming our Patriarchs, paradigms of Chesed and Gevurah, respected leaders in their own lifetimes, and for all time.
Your child is not, chas vâshalom, an Esau even when he doesnât behave as you wish he would. You can still maintain your self-respect when your child disrespects you, even in public. I am not suggesting that you condone or ignore bad behavior. I am urging you not to lash out against it in a way that lessens you, and in no way helps your child. A harsh and impulsive reaction to your childâs misbehavior will probably lead to onlookers to imagine that your child is harsh and impulsive as a result of how you are. A measured and controlled response will probably lead them to think that you are working hard to help your child, even when your child is giving you a very hard time. Yes, your childâs behavior does reflect upon you. Your response reveals your true image.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor with specialties in marriage, relationships, and parenting. He works with parents and educators, and conducts parenting seminars for shuls and organizations. He can be reached at 718-344-6575.
Clients who are interested in Divorce Mediation (Note: This article focuses on divorce mediation but the ideas hold true for all mediation paradigms) will often ask if mediation makes sense even if there will be issues that are not able to be resolved via mediation. Does it make sense to mediate if e.g. only 8 of 10 issues will be resolved via mediation? I believe the answer to this question is in the affirmative. Divorce Mediation serves many purposes and in discussing this question with a client, the true benefit of mediation will become apparent. (For the purpose of this article, I use the term "incomplete agreements" for agreements that leaves some issues unresolved.)
Litigation is costly and traumatic. Even if there is agreement only only some of the issues in dispute, mediation will have served the purpose of lessening dispute, lowering eventual attorney fees, and making it clear to both parties that the matters in dispute are neither unduly numerous nor legally overwhelming. The fact that many issues were indeed resolved via mediation will make agreement on the remaining issues that much greater. Studies support such a conclusion.
Incomplete agreements show the parties that consensus on some issues was indeed attainable. This gives the parties the confidence to continue their communication into the future. Nothing succeeds like success. It is indisputable that agreement was attained because of the "good will" of the parties. The residual "good will" hopefully will continue until the final agreement will eventually be reached. Even in the cases where the disputed issues will need to be submitted to the Court, the level of rancor and confrontation will have been dramatically reduced.
Finally, mediation teaches the parties that they possess the ability to communicate positively and civilly. This communication skill will be needed even after the divorce if they are co-parents or if unanticipated issues eventually arise. Giving this gift of positive dialogue to a divorcing couple is perhaps one of the greatest gifts any mediator can bestow.
Incomplete agreements will sometimes be the end result of divorce mediation. However, the legal fees saved, the "good will" created, and the positive communication experience will all serve the clients well both in the short-term and in the long-term. Divorce mediation is a multi-faceted process and it works, even when it leads to an incomplete agreement.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman, LMHC
When Yisrael made the Eigel, Hashem became angry and said to Moshe, âgo down, for your people have become corrupted.â Moshe said (to himself), âit is a time of anger, I neednât speak now.â What did Moshe do, immediately, âhe turned and went down from the mountain. â(Yalkut Shimoni Shelach Lecha section 743)
Moshe walked away. At the most critical point of G-dâs anger, Moshe did nothing. He didnât appease, he didnât explain, he didnât ask for clemency, he didnât pray to give them chance. He turned around and walked away.
According to the Yalkut, this is the source for the Mishna in Avos that teaches us al tiratzeh es chavercha bâshas kaasoh, do not attempt to placate someone while theyâre angry.
At that time, Moshe came before HaShem and said,â Master of the Universe, etc. forgive them.â Hashem said to Moshe, âbecause you waited, I have forgiven as you requested. (ibid.)
âAt that time.â At what time? At the appropriate time. At the time of panai yeileichu vâchanichasi lach. The time when Hashem, kaviyachol, had calmed down.
Rav Ovadiah miâBartenura quotes this pasuk to remind us that when the anger has diminished, that is the time to placate, soothe, and heal the wounded relationship. Not to pretend it never happened because âthey got over it.â Rather, to revisit and regret the harm inflicted and seek to make amends. When victim and perpetrator are in the heat of emotion, neither regret nor forgiveness are likely to be sincere. Which wouldnât be so terrible. Whatâs terrible is the resentment generated when expressions of regret and forgiveness, unfelt, are imposed.
Moshe said (to himself) it is a time of anger, I neednât speak now.
Contrast this with the attitude, âI canât just ignore it, I have to say something.â
Hashem said, âbecause you waited, I have forgiven as you requested.â
By waiting for a propitious time, Moshe accomplished what he knew was vitally important: the forgiveness he sought for the Bnai Yisrael.
What could possibly be more important than saving our nation? Wouldnât it follow that in such a situation time is of the essence, you canât afford to waste a second?
No, it does not follow. Urgency is not integral to importance. Often, deliberation is a more appropriate response to importance than haste. Moshe understood this, even in a situation whose outcome was potentially catastrophic. Especially in a situation of such gravity, the words of the Tiferes Yisrael on al tiratzeh es chavercha bâshas kaasoh should be carefully considered. He wrote:
The Tanna mentioned 4 types of thoughts that burn like flames, âaffectsâ in the vernacular: anger, grief, fear, and shame. And it is the same with every such thing. When you see a person gripped in an intense emotion, do not fight against it. Not only will you not help him, you will cause harm. [Avos 4:18, s.v. vâal tishtadael]
Affect is a set of observable manifestations of a subjectively experienced emotion. When you see someone experiencing intense emotions, you see their âaffect,â the manifestations of their emotions. When your emotion becomes concern or anxiety over what is happening to them, or even fear of what they may do to you, remind yourself of the words of Pele Yoetz: Ki pri haâmaheerus charata, the fruit of haste is regret. [Pele Yoetz at the end of the secton entitled Yishuv haâDaas] Simply stated: slow down.
Renee had heard all of this at my presentation in her shul. She and her husband Yuri came to discuss how it could apply to them given that their 7 year old and their 6 year old fight over toys daily.
But donât I have to do something?
Yes, Renee, you probably have to do something. What is there for you to choose from?
What I sometimes do, is take away the toy they were fighting over and tell them that if theyâre going to fight over a toy then both of them lose it.
And then they stop fighting? What happens next?
Then they yell at each other over whose fault it was that the toy got taken away. So I sit the two of them down and I ask them why they canât play together nicely, and each of them explains why itâs the other oneâs fault.
I would urge you, Renée, to speak with one child at a time even when the situation involves both of them together.
Weâve tried that. Yuri took the older one and I took the younger one and neither of us got anywhere with either of them. We couldnât get them to calm down.
Iâm sure you couldnât. The Seforno explained that when someone is struggling with strong emotions they are not capable of receiving whatever help you may try to give them. [Avos ibid. s.v. Rabi Shimon ben Elazar] What you are trying to do is appropriate for you as a parent, and I certainly want you to sit down with each of these children and help them figure out how do better next time. And thatâs only going to be useful when you sit down with them at the right time, not while theyâre still upset.
But what are we supposed to do in the meantime, just let them fight over the toy?
If you are concerned that someone might get seriously hurt, do whatever you need to do to prevent that from happening. If youâre confident that they are safe, either leave them alone in a situation that is going poorly or intervene and risk making it worse. You probably wonât make it better at that point in time. Just walk away, Renee.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor with specialties in marriage, relationships, and parenting. He works with parents and educators, and conducts parenting seminars for shuls and organizations. He can be reached at 718-344-6575.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman, LMHC
×Ö¼Ö´×Ö°×¨Öµ× ×Ö²×Ö¸×Ö´××, ×Ö¼Ö°× Ö·×ַת × Ö´×©×Ö°×ָעִ××
The words of the wise are more likely to be heeded when spoken softly. Koheles, 9:17
I explained this to Tikva and Doron.
Tikva explained to me that the only time Doron listens to her is when she yells, and she knows that their children yell a lot because she does, but she doesnât know how else to get her husband to pay attention to what sheâs saying.
What do you think about that, Doron?
Itâs true, I donât realize that sheâs talking to me until she yells and I turn around to see whatâs going on and then I realize that she was trying to tell me something, or ask me something. And sheâs right. The kids are starting to yell just like she does. So we tell them not to yell, but they donât listen.
You softly remind them not to yell?
Not always so softly. I know itâs ludicrous for us to yell in front of our children, and sometimes at them, and then tell them, âWe do not yell in this house!â I know weâre not doing the right thing but we just donât know what else to do.
At this point I realized that my teaching them the words of Shlomo HaMelech in Koheles was both unnecessary and unhelpful. It was unnecessary because they already knew that speaking softly to their children and to each other was the appropriate thing to do. It was unhelpful because they arenât going to be able to do it any better now that they had heard it from me than they had been doing up until now.
What I had been doing up until now was speaking to them in broad concepts and generalities. It was time to get specific.
Doron, you said that you donât realize that Tikva is talking to you until she yells and you turn around to see whatâs going on and then you realize that she was trying to tell you something, or ask you something.
Yes, thatâs what tends to happen.
Tikva, what do you think about that?
Doron gets very absorbed in whatever heâs doing. If I call to him in a normal voice, he really doesnât seem to hear me. I guess I sound annoyed when I yell to him because I wish he could be conscious of whatâs going on around him so I wouldnât have to yell.
Sheâs told me that before, Rabbi Ackerman. And I just realized itâs the same kind of thing when weâre sleeping. Weâll wake up in the morning and sheâll say, âThat was some thunderstorm last night!â And Iâll say, âWhat thunderstorm? I didnât hear anything.â I am a very focused person, asleep and awake; itâs hard to distract me. Sheâs just the opposite. Sheâll hear a child crying from the other end of the house even while sheâs listening to two other kids trying to convince her that the other one is at fault for their latest fight.
So you, Doron, never yell at Tikva to get her attention because you donât need to. You, Tikva, yell at Doron because thatâs how you get his attention. And you both donât like the children yelling, and you think they yell because you do. Tell me, Tikva, how else could you possibly get Doronâs attention?
Iâm not sure. I can call his name in a normal voice ten times and he wonât respond. He only responds when I yell.
I donât hear you until you yell; Iâm not deliberately ignoring you.
I wasnât accusing you of ignoring me deliberately. I still donât know what else to do to get your attention.
I decided to give it one more try before I told them what I was seeing that they hadnât yet seen. Did you notice it? Picture the room and the people in it. Donât just hear it in your mind, see it.
Let me say this again, Doron. You said that you donât realize that Tikva is talking to you until she yells and you turn around to see whatâs going on and then you realize that she was trying to tell you something, or ask you something. What do the two of you think about that?
They thought that Tikva needed to yell. They agreed that her calling his name in a normal voice was not going to register; heâs too focused on whatever else heâs doing. They would have to explain to their children why itâs okay for Tikva to yell to Doron, even though she sounds like sheâs yelling at Doron, which she is because she finds his inability to notice her calling to him very frustrating. And that itâs still not okay for the children to yell.
I thought differently. I thought about Doronâs description of the situation, particularly the following words: I turn around to see whatâs going on and then I realize that she was trying to tell me something.
I didnât say a word. Doron and Tikva were looking at each other. I stood up and walked toward them. When I was about 2 feet from the sofa on which they were sitting, they both looked at me. I silently nodded my head, turned around, and went back to my seat across the room. Doron spoke.
Why did you do that, what did you mean by that, Rabbi Ackerman?
You were focused on Tikva, and I wanted to get your attention, Doron. Apparently, I did.
Lo hamedrash haâikar, elah haâmaaseh. Actions speak louder than words. Gentle actions speak softly, and are more likely to be heeded.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor with specialties in marriage, relationships, and parenting. He works with parents and educators, and conducts parenting seminars for shuls and organizations. He can be reached at 718-344-6
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman, LMHC
Many supermarkets now have a thick yellow painted line somewhere within or at the edge of their parking lots. This particular line is not there to delineate a parking space or to provide any other type of guidance for automobiles or their drivers. It is there to show you a boundary point. There is a sign inside the store that says if you push your shopping cart past that thick yellow line in the parking lot the wheels of your cart will lock.
A few months ago, my car was parked on the street only about 10 feet past the parking lot. I decided to try taking my shopping cart those few feet past the boundary line with every intention of returning it to the cart corral after loading my car. I figured if worst came to worst and the wheels locked at the yellow line, I would carry my grocery bags from my car and then roll the cart back behind the line to the cart corral.
I figured wrong. The wheels seized as soon as I crossed the yellow line, but when I pulled the cart back behind the yellow line the wheels did not unlock. Do you have any idea how heavy an empty shopping cart is when you have to drag it on its locked wheels to the cart corral?
Now imagine this. Imagine a supermarket that arranges for its shopping carts to freeze at some point in the parking lot but they donât mark a line or any other notification of where that point in the parking lot lies. Instead, they equip each cart with a speaker; when the wheels seize, you hear, âyou have passed the line so your cart wheels are now locked.â You seek out the store manager and express your frustration, and the manager replies, âyou shouldâve known not to go that far.â Thatâs hard to imagine, isnât it.
I wonder if you can imagine how often I speak with parents who inform me that their child did something too much, or too often, or too long, and when I ask them, âwhat is the correct amount you had wanted,â the parents say, âI donât know exactly, but he shouldâve known when it was too much.â
The supermarket provided a success strategy. I donât like the way they worded it but I can understand how expressing the success strategy the way I would want you to express it might be a bit clumsy for the supermarket. The sign in the store says, âIf you take the shopping cart beyond the yellow line the wheels will lock.â That is a description of failure and might be deemed a threat. I prefer to describe the behavior that will lead to success, but I donât really expect the supermarket sign to read, âAs long as you keep your shopping cart between the store and the yellow line the wheels will continue to turn.â
My concept of a âsuccess strategyâ is based on the wording of the phrase we say every Shabbos morning: sur mai ra vaâasei tov. Why not just say, sur mai ra, just stop doing something bad, and leave it at that? Because we rarely leave it at that. If we donât find a replacement behavior, weâll sooner or later repeat the behavior we had hoped to replace. A success strategy is a replacement behavior, itâs a concrete awareness what you do want instead of what you donât want.
In addition to preventing relapse into the behaviors you donât want, a success strategy has another very important benefit: it gives you and your child the opportunity to celebrate success instead of bemoaning failure.
I was meeting with Mattis and Blima who had been unable to find a babysitter for their 3 year old daughter Peshi this particular week. Peshi had been sitting quietly on the floor near the sofa playing with a doll for most of the session. Then, she got up, picked up her doll, and walked towards me. Her mother paused and watched Peshi as she came up to me and pushed her doll against my arm.
Donât do that, Peshi, Blima softly chided.
Peshi drew the doll away from me, and stood looking at me. Blima and Mattis resumed their conversation with me. Peshi again pushed her doll against my arm.
Donât do that, Peshi, Blima a little less softly chided.
Peshi again withdrew her doll, and stood looking at me. Blima and Mattis resumed their conversation with me. Peshi again pushed her doll against my arm.
Peshi! I said donât do that! Blima chided, not at all softly.
I spoke softly to Peshi.
Peshi, how tightly can you hug your doll?
Peshi clutched her doll to her chest. Rather than telling her to stop pushing her doll against me, I had asked her to put her doll against herself. Of course, as long as she was pushing her doll against herself, she was no longer pushing her doll against me. I had given her a success strategy, and she was succeeding.
When a child succeeds at meeting an expectation, it is very important that you notice and acknowledge her success.
How often do you think I interrupted my conversation with Mattis and Blima to acknowledge Peshiâs success as she continued to hug her doll rather than pushing the doll against me? I didnât.
I did repeatedly acknowledge Peshiâs success. I did not interrupt my conversation with Mattis and Blima.
Every ten or fifteen seconds, as Peshi continued to succeed at hugging her doll, I looked toward her, made eye contact, pretended to be clutching something against me, and smiled her. She smiled back every time.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor with specialties in marriage, relationships, and parenting. He works with parents and educators, and conducts parenting seminars for shuls and organizations. He can be reached at 718-344-6575.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman, LMHC
A person should strive to be as humble as Hillelâ¦
It once happened that two men made a wager with each other, saying, âWhoever of us makes Hillel angry will win four hundred zuz.â It was erev Shabbos, and Hillel was bathing. The bettor went to the door of Hillelâs home and called out, âIs Hillel here, is Hillel here?â Hillel put on his robe and went out to him, and said, âMy son, what do you seek?â
I have a question to ask.
Ask, my son, Hillel prompted.
He asked: Why are the heads of the Babylonians round?
Hillel replied: My son, you have asked a great question. It is because they have no skillful midwives.
The bettor departed, but returned a few minutes later and called out, Is Hillel here, is Hillel here? Hillel put on his robe and went out to him, saying, My son, what do you seek?
I have a question to ask.
Ask, my son, Hillel prompted.
He asked: Why are the eyes of the Palmyreans bleared?
Hillel replied: My son, you have asked a great question. It is because they live in sandy places.
The bettor departed, but returned a few minutes later and called out, Is Hillel here, is Hillel here?
Hillel put on his robe and went out to him, saying, My son, what do you seek?
I have a question to ask.
Ask, my son, Hillel prompted.
He asked: Why are the feet of the Africans wide?
Hillel replied: My son, you have asked a great question. It is because they live in watery marshes.
I have many questions to ask, the bettor said, but I fear that you may become angry.
Hillel put on his robe, sat before him, and said: Ask all the questions you would like to ask.
The bettor said, Are you the Hillel who is called the Nasi of Israel?
Yes, Hillel replied.
If so, may there not be many like you in Israel.
Why, my son? Hillel asked.
Because I have lost four hundred zuz through you, the bettor complained.
âBe careful with your spirit,â Hillel replied. âHillel is worth it that you should lose four hundred zuz and yet another four hundred zuz through him, yet Hillel shall not lose his temper.â (Shabbos 30b-31a)
Here are two questions about this fascinating passage:
Hillel repeatedly called him âmy son.â He was not Hillelâs son. Why did Hillel begin the words âmy sonâ every time he answered his questions?
Hillel had been bathing. Obviously, he clothed himself before opening his door. Why does the gemara tell us, each time, that Hillel put on his robe?
The Ben Ish Chai answers the first question. In Ben Yehoyada on this gemara, he writes that Hillel reminded himself of a hashkafa and a halacha each time the boy spoke to him impertinently. The hashkafa is to be gentle with someone who behaved inappropriately. By calling him âmy son,â Hillel was showing affection. The halacha is that an Av may be mochel on his kovod, not insist on the honor due him.
I would like to suggest an answer to the second question: what is the significance of the robe?
The Mishna in Avos lists the qualities of someone who learns Torah lishma. One of them is Malbashto anava - he is robed in humility. Perhaps Hillel reminded himself that humility is the prerequisite to responding gently and listening respectfully to someone who didnât properly respect you. Humility allows you to concentrate on helping him improve, instead of focusing on how he mistreated you. Humility allows you to think about how to help a child who didnât do well, rather than ignoring bad behavior or attacking it.
If you ignore inappropriate behavior because youâre too angry, resentful, and frustrated, youâre doing the best you can when you say, âThat was unacceptable. IYH weâll discuss it later,â and you walk away. When you can do better, go back and sit down with your child, and talk over what happened, and what you would like her to do instead the next time.
Hillel, whom the gemara describes as the paradigm of humility, also said Im ani kaan, hakol kaan (Succah 53a) Rav Nisan Alpert, zâtl, taught us that the words mean, âwhen Iâm here, all of me is here,â you have my undivided attention.
That means that sometimes you sit down with your child, and you give her your undivided attention. You choose a place and the time when there will not be external distractions such as other children or your cell phone. (Youâve silenced it and if it vibrates, you will NOT look to see who is on the caller ID.)
Now comes the hard part: you carefully monitor internal distractions. If you begin to think about what you need to convince her of or get her to do, or start to feel impatient or frustrated, tell her that youâd like to change the conversation over to some of your concerns; or postpone the conversation until another time.
When you attack bad behavior, with harsh words and recriminations, you may be âshutting her down.â Your child may become reluctant to engage you in conversation next time. Thatâs the opposite of what hinuch is about.
The names of many of our schools begin with the word Bais. But the first bais is not the one your child attends. Itâs the one you help him become so that his school will be effective.
Hinuch is about creating a bais kibul, helping your child become receptive to the middos and the maasim you value and hope to impart to him. Hillel modeled the middos and the maasim that make that happen.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor with specialties in marriage, relationships, and parenting. He works with parents and educators, and conducts parenting groups for men and women. He can be reached at 718-344-6575.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman, LMHC
It was very nice of Malka to express to her 6 year old son that she regretted having spoken to him harshly. So I was a little bit puzzled when she asked me what I thought about that.
I think it was very nice of you to tell Laibel that you felt bad about how you had spoken to him. What is it that youâre concerned about, Malka?
Iâm just not sure how he took what I said to him because he had kind of a funny look on his face.
Malka, what exactly did you say to him?
I said, âLaibel, Iâm sorry I yelled at you when you spilled your juice. Yelling is not a good thing to do, and Iâm sorry I yelled at you. Are you mochel me?â
And then what happened, Malka?
Laibel said, âyes, mommy.â But he had this look on his face⦠I donât know if he was confused or unhappy or⦠I canât really put my finger on it but somehow he didnât look like everything was okay. What was I supposed to do then?
What did you do then, Malka?
I didnât do anything then, I just said, âokay.â That was the end of it.
It sounds like that was the end of it but it isnât over because youâre still not comfortable with the whole situation as it turned out. First let me tell you that I admire your humility to apologize to your child when youâve done something inappropriate. I think thatâs a beautiful modeling of a wonderful midda. Secondly, you have a sensitivity toward your child which is truly a gift. Thatâs how you arrived at the point where we are now, the point at which you have expressed your regret and youâre concerned about your childâs reaction. The next step for us is to think about what your son might be reacting to.
What do you, dear reader, imagine that Laibel was reacting to? Do you think he was caught off guard by his motherâs apology? I would hope that no child ever be caught off guard by a parent expressing regret for having said something inappropriate. It does not come as a surprise to children that their parents are fallible. It should not come as a surprise to a child when a parent says, âIâm sorry.â Knowing Malkaâs relationship with her children as well as I do, I knew that Laibelâs reaction was not about being caught off guard by his motherâs apology.
Laibel was struggling with something else. Here again, are his motherâs words:
âLaibel, Iâm sorry I yelled at you when you spilled your juice. Yelling is not a good thing to do, and Iâm sorry I yelled at you. Are you mochel me?â
Remember, Laibel is 6 years old. What do you think might have been hard for him as you look again at the words he heard his mother say?
His motherâs statement of apology was not hard for him. What was hard for him was the question she asked him at the end. Hereâs some information that you probably already know, and he probably does not.
You can forgive or you can pardon. Whatâs the difference between them and when does each one apply?
In the Shemonah Esrai, we say âsâlach lanu, forgive us, our Father, mâchal lanu, pardon us, our King.â
A father will forgive a child because he knows and understands the child. To forgive means to understand how the child made this mistake and feel compassion towards the child who didnât do well. The father does not resent the child or bear ill feelings towards him. Thatâs what âforgiveâ means, in contrast to âpardon.â
A king may pardon, which means not punish, someone who did something wrong. A king feels resentment, perhaps even anger, but sometimes doesnât punish the offender.
Where does all this leave six-year-old Laibel? He remembers the time when his mother tripped and nearly fell over the toy she had asked him to put away half an hour earlier. When he said he was sorry, she kissed him and said âI know you didnât mean for me to get hurt,â and she didnât seem to feel bad about it anymore. But now, his mother had asked him to be mochel and he said he was mochel but he still feels bad about how she had yelled at him, so maybe now he didnât really tell the truth when he said he was mochel.
Yes, I can see how that might be why Laibel looked perturbed. What do you think I should tell him now?
Nothing. Iâd rather you ask him what it means to be mochel someone. What it means to him. If he does not understand it the way you meant it, then you get to explain to him how you meant it and see what he thinks then. I suspect that heâll be a lot less perturbed when he finds out you didnât expect him to forget that it ever happened. That is not realistic to expect of a six-year-old who was frightened when you yelled at him. What he can do is hear that you feel bad that you scared him, and you hope that he will better soon.
Thanks to your compassion, he probably will.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor with specialties in marriage, relationships, and parenting. He works with parents and educators, and conducts parenting groups for men and women. He can be reached at 718-344-6575.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman, LMHC
I recently had the honor of chairing a session about parenting at the Agudah Convention. One of the points that was made is the importance of dovening for the well-being of our children.
How important? According to Rav Shlomo Wolbe, zâtl, âDovening for our children is so important that it is possible that tefillah is the most important aspect of chinuch.â (Rigshei Lev, Rav Menachem Nissel, p. 214)
The Mishna Berurah (Siman 47, sif katan 10) identifies three places in shacharis where parents should have intense kavanah that their children should be Torah scholars and tzaddikim and have exemplary middos:
a) In Birkos HaTorah when saying the words âVâniheyeh anachnu vâtzeâetzaâeinu⦠- May we and our offspringâ¦â
b) In Ahavah Rabbah.
c) In Uva LâTzion when saying the words âLemaâan lo niga larik vâlo neled labehalah â So that we do not struggle [in raising children] in vain nor produce for futility.â (ibid. p. 212)
Whatâs missing here? Thereâs no mention of the Shemonah Esrai. We express 13 different requests, and never ask for help in raising our children. Why not?
Truthfully, I didnât think of that question on my own. It was asked by the Belzer Rav ztâl. His answer is recorded in footnote number 3 at the bottom of page 212 in Rav Nisselâs book Rigshei Lev.
He explains that Chazal included the parentsâ tefilah for their children in the Modim prayer.
âThe expression of the tefilah [in many siddurim] is:
magen yishainu atah hu lâdor vaâdor, nodeh lâcha unâsapair tâhilasecha.
But you should be careful to place the comma before the words lâdor vaâdor as follows:
magen yishainu atah hu, lâdor vaâdor nodeh lâcha unâsapair tâhilasecha
This is the tefilah that we have children and childrenâs children who thank Hashem and tell Hashemâs praise.â
I have not conducted an exhaustive search of contemporary siddurim, but I can tell you that the Siddur Vilna does have the syntax that the Belzer Rav recommends. Interestingly, so does a not-so-contemporary Siddur: the Shiloh Siddur is punctuated that way in the weekday shacharis (page 73 of the 1932 Nusach Ashkenaz 4th edition).
Those are some suggestions that may enhance how we doven for our children. How do we enhance our childrenâs dovening?
Here are excerpts from an article I wrote a year ago that addressed that.
Please write down 13 things that you think we ask for from Hashem when we doven.
The first time I gave that assignment was in 1974. The 12 year olds in my class impressed me with some very thoughtful and compassionate requests. We then opened our siddurim, and I showed them the 13 requests we make in the weekday Shemonah Esrai. We spent a lot of time analyzing their lists and discovering that they had intuited much of what the anshei kneses haâgedaloh had put into words for us. What a wonderful success for those children! They were able to see how closely their wishes and hopes aligned with those of some of the wisest sages of all time. Now it wasnât hard for them to express their own thoughts through the words of the prayers, and dovening was a pleasant part of their day.
Another time I gave that assignment was in the mid-1980s. My class comprised a group of women, members of my shul. They too suggested poignant and heartfelt concerns to express to Hashem. When they opened their siddurim they discovered how closely their concerns matched those of the Men of the Great Assembly who composed that prayer so many years ago.
Both times, I continued the discussion by asking them which of the 13 requests in the Shemonah Esrai they had not included in their list. That resulted in some very interesting conversations about how to make a request you hadnât thought of, relevant to you. Most of the time, we were able to figure out some way that every request could be relevant to each of us. When the answer was, âitâs not relevant to me,â the next question I asked was, âwhy do you imagine all of these requests are in the plural rather than the singular form?â I was not surprised at how quickly the women in my class realized that in addition to the deeply personal concerns we express in our dovening, we also pray for the well-being of others. I must admit that I was surprised, and very impressed, by how quickly the children in my class grasped this idea and embraced it. Those 12 year olds began to think of friends, family members, and people whom they didnât personally know, for whom they could pray with various of the paragraphs of the Shemonah Esrai.
A child asked me:
What if I canât think of anybody who needs what a certain paragraph is asking for? Could I just ask Hashem to take my tefilah and use it to help somebody that Hashem knows about?
Children are often sensitive, compassionate, and generous when given the opportunity.
As adults, we have opportunities to express our sensitivity, compassion, and generosity by giving of our time to those closest to us, our children.
The Malbim (on Psalm 90:17) wrote that we can be a source of pleasure to Hashem. I think our prayers, especially when we say them carefully and thoughtfully, are a source of nachas to Hashem.
Sometimes itâs hard to give Hashem nachas. Think about that the next time it seems hard for your child to give nachas to you.
Rabbi Yitzchak Shmuel Ackerman is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor with specialties in marriage, relationships, and parenting. He works with parents and educators, and conducts parenting groups for men and women. He can be reached at 718-344-6575.
Picture the scene. Costello is hamming it up on stage. A bumbling Abbot unknowingly interrupts Costelloâs act and barges in on stage selling popcorn. What ensues is a classic in miscommunication. While Costello is singing âTake me out to the ball gameâ¦â Abbot loudly shouts âget your peanuts and popcorn.â Two characters in the same space saying their own thing- loudly trying outshout each other at the same time. They finally begin a classic dialogue on a shared interest- baseball! Costello calmly and repeatedly tells Abbot the playersâ names- Whoâs on first, Whatâs on Second, I donât know is on Third. Costello is also trying to get his point across and thinks the only way he can do so is by repeating the information. But is he listening or observing Abbotâs frustration and sincere efforts to get the playerâs names correct? Costello mirrors Abbotâs unawareness of his discomfort, much the same way Abbot didnât realize that Costello was in the middle of an act.
Abbot struggles to learn the playerâs names, getting frustrated but still trying to work with Costello. Costello calmly repeats the information about the playerâs names- hammering the information. Itâs a good example of what NOT to do when you want to get your point across - do NOT hammer.
There are several methods of communication that couples can learn that will certainly assist in decreasing frustration. However, it starts with the individualâs willingness to see outside of their viewpoint. If Costello had just tried a little harder to see Abbotâs discomfort, and Abbot had tried a little harder to state that he didnât understand what Costello was sayingâ¦we wouldnât have a classic.
Why write a blog about it? Probably because Iâve been seeing things through a studentâs eyes. Concepts learned in school end up making one apply their skills to every situation. I must admit- itâs fun to look at old experiences with clinical eyes.
Itâs sad that we find characters failure to communicate with each other funny. Funny means thereâs no work to be done. Communication starts with the realization that one must begin by changing himself. We can enjoy Abbot and Costello- but learn from them! We must constantly work on communication skills in our own lives.
âNuff said for now. Whatâs tickling your funny bone- and what can you learn? Please comment belowâ¦
Hereâs the link to âwhoâs on firstâ- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sShMA85pv8M
Her child wasnât disturbed, nor was he aggressive or sensory ( lacking social boundaries). J was bright. Really bright. Sometimes higher iqâs come with some behavior issues. He was getting bored in class and needed more stimulation. Period. When this eval took place, J was 2.
Mom took him out and put him in a different environment with a loving teacher. The teacher took the reports, took one look at J- and dumped the reports in the garbage.
If you looked at past recommendations of Jâs teachers. They said he was disturbed, aggressive, sensory and knew no boundaries. The mom took this with a grain of salt. Then she took him for his own independent evaluation to find out further information in terms of school placement.âLetâs give him a chance to adjust.â
2 years later, J is thriving, aware of social boundaries and has little behavior issues. Mom has relaxed and has learned to be focused and set limits. The teacher stated that she never judged anyone who walked into her classroom. She gives everyone a chance. Through that lens- the power of believing in the strengths of the children, the teacher has done some phenomenal work.
Whew. What can be learned?
The power of belief can transform anyone. This can be applied to anyone who walks in the office door. When our clients walk in the door, we have to believe in them. Maybe weâre the only ones that do believe in them. Itâs a powerful message that always comes through.
So, what about the clients that seem hopeless? The ones we feel we made little progress with? There was little one could do for M. A holocaust survivor with severe Alzheimers. I used to simply stroke her arm and use reflective listening as she cried about the Nazis coming to get her for stealing a piece of bread. Her living room was the prison where she was taken to. When she was hospitalized for the last time, and I knew she was dying, it was hard. However, I also felt no one could take away the few seconds of piece she must have felt while I saw her.
Our beliefs in clients may be the only belief they have. Our belief in our own abilities is important as well. Noone can take away the time ( even one session) and the belief we have in our clients. And, if the client doesnât come back- that belief may encourage the client to pursue treatment again.
Powerful stuff. Our belief in ourselves, and our clients can transform lives.